• He wanted to go out of India. his plan was to get asylum in the US. But US people are smarter and understood his anti Hindu feeling.
  Many of the muslims in India hate Hindus. Husain is one of them. He used to boldly make paintings of Hindu God - Godses. This can not be the attitude of a neighbour or fellow friend. This is the feeling / grudge / anger / hatred. It is good that people with such nasty ideas move away from us and make our place good and clean. Answered by Ratan Poddar , HEAD - DOMESTIC SALES at CRESCENT | 27, Mar 2010 12:33 AM

• If M.F. hussain ist make his good painting for his godess mohhamad sahab or fatima like hindu godess. I am the first person to welcome in INDIA Answered by Vivek Aggrwal | 19, Mar 2010 11:26 AM

• We, have lost a good painter, we always forget what good he has contributed to us, and remember what has hurt us. So many years he has been in India. We should have prevented his exile. Answered by Ruma Agwekar , Proprietor at Petals | 18, Mar 2010 08:27 PM

• We, have lost a good painter, we always forget what good he has contributed to us, and remember what has hurt us. So many years he has been in India. We should have prevented his exile. Answered by Ruma Agwekar , Proprietor at Petals | 18, Mar 2010 08:27 PM

Comments (1)

• There are many such good painters. It was Russi Modi of Tata Steel who pulled Hussain from rags and asked him to paint certain portion of TATA CENTRE. There after he rose with support from Tata s.
  His style is using Horse heads mainly - stereo type and lacks creativity.. Commented by Ratan Poddar, HEAD - DOMESTIC SALES at CRESCENT | 680 days ago

• 
  Judge yourself......................please read and see the picture
  If a person dresses like a Sikh Guru, thousands of Sikhs gather and destroy their establishments , threaten to kill him, announce a bounty on his head - Sikhs are not criticised for being communal and intolerant,
  If a Danish journalist depicts the Prophet of the Muslims , Muslims all over the world rise in anger, there is violence, a booty on the head of the Journalist - Muslims are not criticised for being communal and intolerant,
  ...See MoreIf MF Hussain draws paintings depciting Hindu Gods and Goddesses ######### positions (which relations are not borne out by ancient texts at all ) and Hindus merely protest , they are called communal, intolerant and taught lessons in secularism by one and all.
  The problem apparently is not with Sikhs and Muslims, it is with Hindus , because we are not violent, we accept what ever is dished out to us , we do not have the guts to say that this is wrong , we seek acceptance from outsiders rather than from our conscience. We worship the same GOds and Godesses but dont stand up for them when the time comes.
  Be a judge yourself of Hussain ' s paintings below.
  
  Goddess Durga ######### union with Tiger
  
  Prophet ' s Daughter Fatima fully clothed
  
  Goddess Lakshmi naked on Shree Ganesh ' s head
  
  M.F. Hussain ' s Mother fully clothed
  Naked Saraswati
  
  
  Mother Teresa fully clothed
  
  Naked Shri Parvati
  Hussain ' s Daughter well clothed
  
  Naked Draupadi.
  
  Well cloth! ed Muslim Lady.
  
  Naked Lord Hanuman and Goddess Sita sitting on thigh of Ravana
  
  Muslim poets Faiz, Galib are shown well-! clothed
  
  Full Clad Muslim King and naked Hindu Brahmin. The above painting clearly indicates Hussain ' s tendency to paint any Hindu as naked and thus his hatred..
  
  
  Naked Bharatmata - Hussain has shown naked woman with names of states written on different parts of her body. He has used Ashok Chakra, Tri-colour in the painting. By doing this he has violated law & hurt National Pride of Indians. Both these things should be of grave concern to every Indian irrespective of his religion.
  !
  
  Out of the four leaders M. Gandhi is decapitated and Hitler is naked. Hussain hates Hitler and has said in an interview 8 years ago that he has depicted Hitler naked to humiliate him and as he deserves it ! How come Hitler ' s nudity cause humiliation when in Hussain ' s own statement nudity in art depicts purity and is in fact an honour ! This shows Hussain ' s perversion and hypocrisy.
  Don ' t feel shy to circulate. Atleast 10 people should know,
  'HOW COWARD WE HINDUS ARE'
  WE DON'T HAVE COURAGE TO PROTECT OUR SELF RESPECT Answered by Prabhakar G Hegde , Deputy Manager,pulp mill at Grasim Industries Ltd | 15, Mar 2010 10:52 PM

• No need to be ashamed.No questions no arguments.Does creativity lies in painting deities in nude? He should be punished as per law. Answered by Atul Shukla | 11, Mar 2010 11:35 AM

• M F Husain's exile is final. Why should we ashamed? Yes why should we ashamed - we should be shamed in front of the world that we grown up responsible people working in key positions do not no proper Grammar.And what if a Famous personality decides to Stay abroad ??? dont we all have our personal preferences ???? Have you ever thought how painful it might have been to leave the land one has spent their youth and enjoyed fame in. Please do not post such rubbish here make it pertinent, Those who agree will ubderstand the Question and for those who do not Agree then this is not a Question but a reply . Answered by subramanyam venkateshwaran , Partner at Zion's Security Solutions | 11, Mar 2010 04:18 AM

• I totally endorse freedom of expression but I do not support defiling of others' deities.
  
  Hussain is now waht he calls a country where free expression is encouraged. Good for him. I would love him to draw a nude of Fatima.
  
  Why then do we have a fatwa against the Danish newspaper? Is freedom of expression only the domain of one community?
  
  No folks, communication is a two way process.
  
  India should NOT be ashamed. In fact Hussain has to answer and provide his logic for defiling deities of other religions. If his answers are not satisfactory, he should be dealt with as per the laws of the land. Answered by Ajay Chaudhari , CEO at Adroit Consultants | 09, Mar 2010 06:01 PM

• No one is allowed to insult humiliate human beings…..why involve GOD into this, no matter whose religion is?
  Hussain must be booked under the law of land.
  
  Appreciate vies of Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh and sarjerao madane
  
  Answered by Sanjiv | 09, Mar 2010 01:46 PM

• we should be ashamed cause we are indian, the country is demaocratic and so called dharmnirpeksha. we say abt integrity, right to expression and a versatile legal and constitutional rights. that has been said to be for us. when communist government of wb had not entertain taslima, for the sake of muslim fanatics.., then how can we expect from congress or other political parties of india who have no idiology, to give support or security to m f hussain against hindu fanatics. when the maharashtra govt are not defending the gair marathis in mumbai.., then the matter of hussain was too bigger. waise bhe kala ko samajhne aur apreciate karne ke liye dimagh chahiye, jo kathmullaon aur extrimists me nahi hota... Answered by Akbar Rizvi , Bulletin Producer at ETV Network | 08, Mar 2010 08:10 PM

Comments (2)

• The problem is we are too long sighted too even see and decipher our immediate dangers .Mr. Akbar you sound right but it pains to hear ,"so called secular ',pardon me if i may repeat what my gentle man soldier friend said ,you get what you deserve ,but then who is to be blamed for the present day scenario:perhaps us all .Brothers ! the question is least related to any Hussain -several of them may come and go ,the issue is can we hold the values on which we stand .Please ponder .. Commented by chandra pathak, secretary at upmsra | 703 days ago
• Respected Rizvi Saheb,
  I highly appriciate your answer and support it,
  
  If we are unable to protect a persons right of expressions then i am in doubt we will be able to protect fall of indian morality and India
  
  We must call back MF Husain saheb immediately with great apology to assure and establish one right of expression,
  
  It will help all indian to express there view without feer and fevour,
  
  With warm regards,
  Balbir. Commented by Balbir Singh Shekhawat, Product Manager - Field Crops at Mahyco | 703 days ago

• whatever he did was totaly wrong . he draw naked picture of hindu god"s.he has to apologize hindu people inteaded of ran away from india. can he draw any picture of his god. so dont bother whatever happened is right and totaly hussain is responsible for that. Answered by sarjerao madane , operation at Saudi International Petrochemical Company | 08, Mar 2010 01:14 PM

• No need to ashamed any Hindu or Indian. No such muslim written or make painting of their Prophet Muhammed that he was born from prostitute. No tomid Hindu dare to speak against Muslim relegion. But Muslim dare to do frequently.
  But because of lot of social prostitute born in Hindus society who dare to say anything angainst Hunduism and insult to Hindu gods for some greed of Money and fame.
  When thousants of Kashmiri women raped, burned alive and youth killed, no Social prostitute so called NGO came forward to help them and greedy politician not dare to speak against them. But aftermath of burning of Hindu alive in Godhera by Muslim, angry Gujarati youth killed few muslim in reaction then these social prostitute and politician ...See More start crying for Muslim. While no of Muslim died may not be more than the people charred /burned in the train.
  This is only because mostly Hindus are Timid and shelfise. Some may clapp at the time of their Mothers rape if they get some money and fame.
  This dicussion must be stopped. Answered by Arvind Kumar Singh , Factory Manager at PI Industries Limited | 07, Mar 2010 09:51 PM

Comments (1)

• This is how fascism works ,you placed your point of view and you want it to be the last word on the issue and must therefore be closed .............why on earth we be tolerant enough to the others opinion ,may quite possibly be . altogether divergent from our's .sir lets keep the spirit of democracy alive.. Commented by chandra pathak, secretary at upmsra | 703 days ago

• he is an world class artist and aproud indian. we blame on his work!. he deserve what every indian deserve. "freedom". how we interpret the anciant work existing own our famous temple and other monument which every indioan are realy proud of. Answered by varghese.a.l , projec t engineer at saudi electricity company | 06, Mar 2010 09:42 AM

• What is the question of being ashamed?? This is the option he has opted. His work in the name of Art was a shame. He has never painted his "Apni Mata" instead painted "Bharat Mata" and selected only Hindu Goddesses!
  No one should take that level of "freedom of expression" in the disguise of Art or literature that becomes unacceptable to a very large population. In India, we do not approve every action of right wing people, but some some them like what happened against MFH is always welcome. He can not be allowed to take the whole Hindu community for granted just because he is an artist!! Answered by Anant Mishra , General Manager-Projects at Jindal Urban Infrastructure Ltd. | 05, Mar 2010 11:26 PM

Comments (1)

• where is the question of being ashamed. Will he have the guts to paint nude pictures of other faith God or can he make cartoon of other religion beliefs. Only everybody likes to play with Hindu culture. We have to stop such mudslinging on our culture by these people who do not understand the real spirit of hindu spirit and scriptures. . Commented by brahamanapalle Murthy, Manager Internal Audit at Ashok Leyland Ltd | 703 days ago

• he knows that he has completed his 99 mistakes like jarasandh this is result of guilt.he punished him self n gult Answered by Girishprasad Tiwari , lab chemist at Century Rayon | 05, Mar 2010 10:20 PM

• Not at all! This is a decision of a professional. Do we say that when a doctor or an engineer takes another citizenship? No. Actually beyond a certain IQ, a certain age and a certain wealth; nationalism just disappears. MF Hussain has a combination of all three factors. So, no surprises and definitely no shame.
  Kapil Answered by Kapil Paliwal , CEO at Paliwal Eye & Retina Centre | 05, Mar 2010 08:21 PM

• No one should get ashamed for this .Yes it was little bit late to through him out from indian citizenship .Any Indian (any religion) will not ashmed from this.There is a very huge gap between human values and his type of artist.I agree that ins earlier we consider him as a good artist .but this was not art just result of his dying brain. Answered by Manoj Kandpal , Sales Manager at General Motors India Pvt. Ltd | 05, Mar 2010 04:20 PM

• We need not be ashamed at all. In fact we should be proud that such people are no longer Indians. There is a limit to tolerence and depicting Hindu Goddess in a vulgar way cannot be tolerated in any society. If the same thing is done by Husain in Oman which hurts the sentiment of Muslims he will have to face the same fate of Salman Rushdie. and Taslima Nasreen . Answered by Murali Nair V , GM-Finance at FACT Limited | 05, Mar 2010 01:02 PM

• It will be interesting to classify the reactions and put percentages to them. The press in the mainstream appears to be obsessed with the topic to drive home the point that this should not have happened. There appears to be a conflict of interests between the artist's creative freedom and sensibilities of religion. The uniqueness of faith in India is the intelligentsia in India are themselves as a class not so sensitive to the larger but less vocal population who value their faith several notches above the idea of freedom. What makes a society? Absolute freedom or relative freedom with certain responsibilities? Secondly, a number of lesser mortals live in an environment of rightist actions in so many ways - the number is far too ...See More big to be offered citizenship elsewhere. It is time all legislative actions are aggregated to Supreme Court and a judgement pronounced on MFH. Let us all respect the law of the land - that is the only way, a modern society can deal with these complex issues. If the law itself is found fault with, the democratic process has to deliver change. Nothing will be achived by fancying freedom without any equation with responsibility. God help India, who is torn between freedom of art and values of faith. Answered by GOPALAN PARTHASARATHY , Vice President & Head - Risk, KSA at BankMuscat | 05, Mar 2010 12:59 PM

• No need to ashame; because the decision was his own. Instead of talking about him, we can spend time on encouraging other young artists in our country. I am not sure we as country have lot of talents and as a citizen we have responsbility to bring them up and provide good opporunities. Answered by Sundar | 05, Mar 2010 09:53 AM

• I think we as a community have not grown. We are still looking for narrow gains. Every citizen has a right to live and express his/her thoughts in a free way. Today we force one to leave the country, then tomorrow it will be another exodus that will have devastating ramifications. Answered by Ashok Kumar , Editor at The Indian Sub-continent Times | 05, Mar 2010 07:04 AM

Comments (2)

• Anant is very much right.....
  Every freedom has some specific boundries...!!!!. Commented by MANU GARG, Process Consultant at QUASUS India | 705 days ago
• Dear Ashok, If your neighbor (also a citizen of this country) paints your ......... in nude, in the name of Art, would you accept that?. Commented by Anant Mishra, General Manager-Projects at Jindal Urban Infrastructure Ltd. | 706 days ago

• If anyone is really a supreme professional expert in any field, he will think more than twice before acting or taking part in any activity which could turn sensitive. It is not fear that drives but sensibility. Our expert M F Hussain was misled and did what he did and had to repent. But by highlighting it as a shame our media is exposing India in negative light and dividing the public opinion or atleast the art fraternity in using their sensibilities. Answered by Sandeep Pandya , Sales Development Manager (Pan India) at Pidilite Industries Limited | 05, Mar 2010 12:10 AM

• Innumerable Indians are living in foreign countries and their fate is not even discussed in the media. If Hussin thinks his decision to quit Indian nationality is SANE why bother. India gave him freedom of expression and the rightists also have freedom to disagree with his artistic whims. We can only wish Hussain all the best for his future and hope he does not dare his new countrymen with similar artistic freedom. But if he wants to compare the Indian response with his new country's response he should at least once fill the canvas with some comparable images. Hope the media will use its space for more purposeful happenings around us. Answered by anil kapoor , Associate Professor at RRHPM Arts College | 04, Mar 2010 08:50 PM

• The person who don't know to respect goddies,he made NUDE PHOTO of Goddies.Its really very shame full.How we pepole will allow to live him in our country.
  In fact this decison is late but no problem very right.
  
  Vikas sachan Answered by Vikas Sachan , Technical sales officer at Indofil Chemicals Company | 04, Mar 2010 08:35 PM

• All those who have talked of low tolerance level in our country etc. should first answer one simple question : what is their view on someone painting a goddess in the nude, that too a goddess of a faith not practised by the person ? I agree that we should not take law in our hands and as a society should provide complete security to everyone and that law should take its own course. However, the basic question about the propriety of the acts of Husain Saheb remains. He is not even apologetic about it.
  Answered by Vijay Nadkarni | 04, Mar 2010 07:46 PM

• Not at all! This is a decision of a professional. Do we say that when a doctor or an engineer takes another citizenship? No. Actually beyond a certain IQ, a certain age and a certain wealth; nationalism just disappears. MF Hussain has a combination of all three factors. So, no surprises and definitely no shame. Answered by Kapil Paliwal , CEO at Paliwal Eye & Retina Centre | 04, Mar 2010 07:11 PM

• No , there is nothing to be ashamed . Artistic freedom does not mean hurting sensibilities of others . See what happened in Karnataka over the reported remark of Taslima about Burka . If one community is so sensitive over coverage of face , how can you expect that others will not be hurt by nude paintings . The psedudosecular views aired by his supporters who are ashamed are not to be given cognisance at all. These people want that I will welcome all intrusion into one\'s relegion /sensibilities , but at the same time condemn if it is done to the perpetrators.
  
  By the way I am not a votary of religious bigotry or a diehard relious person . However , the views of pseudoseculsr people forces people like us also to oppose ...See More nonsense in the name of artistic freedom . If it is so why the government stops showing of certain channels !!!!!
  
  I think all the discussion on Hussain should stop and let him be at peace at whereever he wants other than India . Answered by Jayant Singh | 04, Mar 2010 06:05 PM

• One may think that this as unfortunate, but one has to judge whether is really worth discussing and think of a man like Hussain, who disregarded and hurt the faith of a common Indian in general, where he was reprimanded in the court of law for one of his paintings, and hurting the sentiment of Hindu faith by depicting the goddesses in nude under the grab of ART. His disrespect only shows his communal hatred and taking shelter in the name of ART does not convince a common man. If he thinks of playing with/depicting nudity is ART, why did not he hurt the sentiments of his fellow community members and why did he not tried to depict himself in nudity? Yes, he may be a so called renowned artist, but his greatness or fame does not ...See More exonerate him from his mistakes or does not give him the right to hurt the sentiments of others. Let the people who are making hue and cry of attacks on him as attack on freedom of expression, think for a minute if his depictions were of them instead of Hindu goddesses, will they really make the same noise. I am not trying to justify or speaking in favour of attacks on him. My point is clear whether he did the right thing in the first place. Can Mother India feel proud of a person who insults and hurts fellow brethren? Instead of accepting his wrong and mistakes, he decided to go on exile and now taken the citizenship of an Islamic country - he did not choose to opt for citizenship of a western country even. It does not make any sense for him to feel insecure in his own country, where a crores of people of different faiths living together without hurting each other. His blaming of others for his misdeeds and his own fortunes should not be taken seriously. In my mind and opinion one should least bother about him and his blame game and the earlier he goes off from the memory of Indians, it is the better for a common Indian. Answered by V R K J Lanka , Dy Manager at Financial Services Company | 04, Mar 2010 06:04 PM

• Democracy means to exercise freedom & rights in an appropriate manner without hurting the sentiments of fellow citizens...In this case of M.F.Hussain, simply because you are a celebrity does not mean he can vandalize and uproot the basic decorum of citizenship. Why should he accept citizenship of Qatar? He could have very well stayed back in India and justified what he has done is not wrong or he can seek appology if he feels he has hurt the sentiments of fellow citizens. India is such a great nation in the world that has the distinction of peace,harmony,unity, accomodative spirit, no matter what religion,cast,creed,race you belong to.
  We have progressed so well with the sheer population that any country would have not achieved ...See More this feat. Let us not succumb to those who are empathizing Mr.Husaain. We must be clear of what we as Indian citizens ought to excercise as democratic rights and respect the fellow citizens with the same attitude as we ourselves deserve irrespective of religion,cast ,creed & race. I am not ashamed of Hussain's exile. Answered by Srisailan Krishnamurthy , General Manager at Tablets India Limited | 04, Mar 2010 05:57 PM

• reknowened? IN WHAT CONTEXT? DEMEANING A RELIGION?
  A HUMANITY WHICH HAS BEEN HUMILIATED NON STOP
  SINCE chengis khan?
  INDIANs still have not understood what they ARE,
  may not UNDERSTAND never REALISE Answered by murthy snb , Director at moorty productions | 04, Mar 2010 05:51 PM

• Mr. Husain is a very nonsense person, making drama by going out from India.India will not loss anything of Hussain's exile. Answered by Manas Dash , Electrical engineer(Project & Maintenance) at Saudi Basic Industries Corporation | 04, Mar 2010 05:27 PM

• This is sthe first time when an artist was ousted from a country and he sought citizenship in an another country. We should be sorry for this and we must recall him back in our country. Answered by dalip wasan , Advocate at Individual ual | 04, Mar 2010 04:54 PM

• I don’t think we need to give importance to the people like Husain. His words should not be believed. When you are in a country where majority population are Hindus one should refrain from doing things and acts which hurts the feelings and sentiments of Majority. Can he do the same In Pakistan or any other country where other religion population is majority? For that matter can he express the same kind of self expression in Qatar? He should know his single act of disrespecting the religion in that country will have his head cut off. Right to speak or as said by Hussain "Self expression" is not at all acceptable when the expression is hurting majority feelings. One should refrain from such acts. Just because he was in ...See More India, he could escape capital punishment.
  We Hindus believe in forgiving and accepting. Due to this softness the so called secular parties and people like Hussain are able to survive.
  I don’t think any Indian will care where he lives. I strongly feel Indian Government should not allow publishing of news or articles related to Hussain and cancel his citizen ship immediately. We should have done this on the day when he showed his art to the world. For that matter even has to boycott him. I cannot accept any one who insult mother India and our goddess. Answered by Srinagesh Tanikella , Manager Finance at TNS India Pvt. Ltd. | 04, Mar 2010 03:40 PM

• We are not ashamed , Govt which offers citizenship to persons against whom case is pending should be ashamed.
  
  Will quatar offer citizenship to all citizens of the world against whom case is pending.
  
  How will qatar feel if we start offering citizenship to all there citizens agaainst whom case is pending in qatar. Answered by Ashim Saha , Head Field Marketing and Business Development at Pidilite Industries Limited | 04, Mar 2010 03:05 PM

• This is very less punishment for M.F. hussian, If he or his friends think they are right. I give challange to make such paintnig for him own relegion god. Then all world see what is reaction of him relegion person. Answered by vivek | 04, Mar 2010 02:58 PM

• Rather than answering the question.....I would like to ask a question......Has Mr.M.F.Hussain shown the same frredom of expression for his own religion.
  
  Before demanding freedom of expression people should be sentitive about other people's feeling and if somebody had misunderstood them, then they should have the courage to face that rather than running away from it. Answered by Rahul Kalia , Head Training & Talent Development at Bayer India Limited | 04, Mar 2010 02:55 PM

Comments (1)

• I agree with you totally. Misuse of others sensitivity only proves that one is not humane..One has to be very very careful when he has opted or chosen to be a public figure. There are advantages of being one, flip side, one has to be sensitive and sacrifice a lot. . Commented by meera mohan, Regional Manager at Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd | 707 days ago

• I am ashamed that there are people who make a hue and cry when a rogue intellectual gets into trouble. Where were you all when they bashed up taslima? and sent Rushdie into exile? Merely because the Hindu is a very tolerant creature it does not mean that you can insult hindu beliefs and get away with it. Such persons who wish to have creative expressions must do so with their own religion and not other peoples. Let that painter go and live in a country where he cannot paint female anatomies unless in purda. Then he will realise the meaning of freedom in India. I don't understand why you guys are making it such a big issue. Answered by C.R. Ravi Chandran , Editor, Legal adviser at lunes publishers | 04, Mar 2010 02:55 PM

• We should not be ashamed , Country which offers citizenship to a person against whom a case is pending should be ashamed.
  
  Will Qatar offer citizenship to all citizen against whom case is pending in our court? Answered by Ashim Saha , Head Field Marketing and Business Development at Pidilite Industries Limited | 04, Mar 2010 02:54 PM

• He is just just porno painter. We need not care for him. Actually, he is an absconder from the Country. He should rather be extradited to India to face judicial trials.
  All the \"intellectuals/ secularists\" shedding tears for him starting from \"Hon\'ble\" Home minister should get paintings of their mother/ wife by him in the same way he did for Godess Sarawathi. If he does similar painting of his own God, he will be dealt with appropriately by his adopted country. Answered by Ramaswamy K | 04, Mar 2010 02:50 PM

• We should feel honoured that he has been compelled to quit this country for his own mistakes. His gesture of agonising the masses through the medium of art was really worth condemnation. His repeated attempts to remain in public focus by creating controversies needed much more public reprimand Answered by Dinesh Shah , Vice President ( Finance & Accounts) at Meghmani Organics Limited | 04, Mar 2010 02:18 PM

• India needs some law to punish those who are creating insult to majority communities, it is the not insult, he delibrately played with the sentiments of majority community who are irrespective of age of women/female call Maaji/amma, Indians considered calling India a mother land, such a place he has wantedly painted the Godess Saraswathi such a way, is it right way, why don't he paints with his own community prophet's same tipe of paintings? and see what will happen. There is enough of tolarance from Indians. Answered by Ram Indrakanti , Manager Business Development at Incubate Soft Tech Pvt.Ltd | 04, Mar 2010 01:51 PM

• 
  Should we? India is probably the world's largest exporter of highly skilled people. We believe in the "hatchery" concept, with a social twist (probably like the KEGGS story).
  Countries like USA, UK, France, Canada, Singapore, Malayasia & even Australia have benefited hugely by very capable Indians who have migrated, in millions to their inviting lands.
  Our policy frameworks & undying socialistic values have made sure that we, as a country, find good in doing good, to all our worldly neighbours!
  ...See MoreWe have been immensely successful in exporting hi-calibre engineers, doctors, artisans, economists, literateurs, a few MBAs (we still believe the rest can salvage us), since days of the British raj.
  Now it's time for the creative artistes to move out.
  Let us join hands in wishing all success to this new breed of "exports". We "will" beat China here, as always. Answered by Arnab Sengupta , Head - Projects / Home Entertainment at Living Media India limited | 04, Mar 2010 01:24 PM

• We are not ashamed, when he was in India he enjoyed the Indian people Faith, know when there are bad days he his leaving Indian, this shows that Mr. Husain is himself man & not Indain art. Answered by Paresh Prajapati , Creative Head & Account Executive at Dheer Advertising | 04, Mar 2010 01:20 PM

• This instance has reflected an undemocratic state of affairs in India. The government has agreed to provide adequate security to MF Husain. Even then if the renowned Husain does accept the Qatar citizenship it\'ll set a wrong example for everybody. Answered by Pradeep Gupta , Manager at Times Business Solutions Limited | 04, Mar 2010 01:09 PM

• No, their is no reason for us to be ashamed. When he lived in India , he had enough voice, clout and colour to express freely . Much more than most leberal societies. If he did offend sentiments of a populace, he should have apologised . Where was his EQ then ? When emotions get stirred , response needs emotional containment. He chose to run away and take shelter in another country not well known for liberal belief. This actually accentuates what most people think , that his art was deliberate and intentional. Why should we be ashamed of escapists of a deliberate kind? Answered by Siddhartha Bhattacharjee , CEO at ALPS India | 04, Mar 2010 01:07 PM

• Artistic freedom of expression does not mean that one should portrait his/her mother nude one enjoy freedom.One should not forget the consequences for crossing the boundary between respect and freedom. Answered by Pradipkumar Baidya , CONSTRUCTION MANAGER at TARGET ENGINEERING CO. | 04, Mar 2010 12:59 PM

• We are not ashamed. He should feel ashame after painting of naked goddess. We respect every religon and in india Muslim get special treatment but in the name of freedom or religion they can not do anything. If he true Indian then he should come to india and accept whatever punishment, if any awarded by our honourable court. Answered by Sameer B. Pradhan , Manager - Internal Audit at Emerson Network Power | 04, Mar 2010 12:57 PM

• we should not be ashamed..It is upto him .I have reservations about his paintings.It is good to be expressive but shouldn't there be a limit to that.The way Mr MF Hussain had painted the neked Godesses was not in a good taste.It was avoidable.But notwithstanding anything, it is the duty of the govt to protect its citizens MFHussain and lesser mortals included. Answered by Kanwar S Khatana , Head (HR &Admin) at Harig India Private Limited | 04, Mar 2010 12:15 PM

• I think there is no need to feel ashamed about Husain's individual decision. His exile from India is self imposed, as he fears for his safety. He should thought about it before proceeding on the path of derogatory portrayals of Hindu goddesses. We are a open society, but that does not mean you are free to hurt the sentiments of your fellow citizens. He should thank his fortune that he did what he did to the Hindus. Had it been for Islam, he would have been dead long back. Answered by Rajeev Sawant , Manager-International Marketing at ACG Worldwide | 04, Mar 2010 12:13 PM

• I am sickened and saddened by all the hate and venom in these pages. Hussain and Taslima Nasreen are but symbols of our intolerance. If all the defenders of the faith are so bothered about the depiction of women and Goddesses, why does no one protest against the item numbers in films, about scantily clad goddesses in every mythological serial and film? And this is a faith that openly worships the Lingam and Yoni and yet pretends that sex and nudity are offensive! As Kabir said,
  Burra jo dekhan mai chala, burra na miliya koi
  Jo dil dekha apna, mujhse burra na koi
  Turn the mirror , people, and let us face the ugliness of our our hatred and intolerance. Answered by Mahalakshmi Jayaram , Associate Professor at Asian College of Journalism | 04, Mar 2010 11:57 AM

• And to answer Ms Mittal's questions and smug pride, yes Ma'm, we should be ashamed not just of our thin veneer of tolerance but also of our ability to hate so much, of our ability to be so vicious to the weak and marginalised and so 'humble' to the powerful. This discussion reveals a nation of Uriah Heeps - read your Dickens before you curse! Answered by Mahalakshmi Jayaram , Associate Professor at Asian College of Journalism | 04, Mar 2010 11:50 AM

• We need not feel ashamed of MFs exile at all. For, I too understand his creative urges' needs as an artist but could he dare paint a cigar in Jisus' mouth or the Holy Koran painted with cow-dung and disrespected? If he is so creative and freedom of expression chauvinist, then he must do such things and then be ready to face music. Although I am a secular Indian, this doesn't mean that I should tolerate such crooked deliberate efforts to demean my feelings even by the world's top artist. He got what he deserved for! Anyways, Indian Government was as usual lenient to him as it is always towards the non Hindus. Answered by Sharvari Joshi , Free lance Journalist at self employed | 04, Mar 2010 11:33 AM

• Nothing like that. MFH is free to do what he want but he must take responsibility of the things he is doing. Every action has reaction. Let him draw such drawings for Muslim or other religions. Other religions also have fantacy stories and characters. Why he is fascinated by Hindu god's characters only?
  
  Hindus are patient and most disgusting is Hindus are resisting hindus... anyway...let MFH be happy in Quatar. At least it's shows cultural difference that there is no FATWA against him by hindus... Answered by Dilip Jahagirdar , Project manager at Simba Technology Limited | 04, Mar 2010 11:23 AM

• He was one more Indian and did not have the guts to face the various case which were legitimately filed against him. If he cannot respect our laws he has no right to be Indian. We should have expelled him or extracted him to proceed the cases. Only some people had taken law into thier hands to shout at him as he has hurt our feelings. Answered by CHANDRA SEKHAR S , finance contyroller at a major construictiopn company | 04, Mar 2010 11:12 AM

• Why Qatar citizenship ????? why not non Muslim country.It seems his mind set & I strongly feel that exile will definately help to produce 100 of MFH. Answered by Anil Kumar Srivastava , Divisional Sales Manager at Shalimar Paints Ltd | 04, Mar 2010 11:03 AM

• My veiw is when any person belong to India or having Indian citizenship, he has to pay respect to all the religion belong to India. You just can't make insult to other religion though you are at Mount Everest peak. You just can not make your talent to insult any religion. I strngly believe that we must not ashamed if MF Husain is now NRI. Answered by Chandra Shekhar Deshpande , AREA MANAGER at NAGARJUNA FERTILIZERS & CHEMICALS LIMITED | 04, Mar 2010 10:58 AM

• there is nothing to be ashamed or regret it just a matter or convenience, hussain find more convenient to be in qwait so he accepted why make so much of hype of this. i think it waste of time to write comment on this question but still i am writing knw why because i find lost of funny comment and big words that make me laugh... thanks for make me smile keep writing ......... Answered by rajeev gautam , portfolio manager at art store india | 04, Mar 2010 10:56 AM

• I like to answer in Hindi, Bharat apne aap mein mahan hain toh sharam ki baat hi nahin aati. Bhartiya log is dhati ke bacch hai toh bhai ya behnow mein aan-ban hoti hai toh koi ghar chod ke na jaata hai.
  Now this thing world famous painter or artist cant understand than we are normal people. There is no matter for ashamed He took his own decision no one can help out. Answered by Dev Padmashali , Designer at Adorn Tour Consultancy | 04, Mar 2010 10:54 AM

• I do not think we need to be ashamed for his decision. There are scores of people opting for US citizenship. Are we ashamed for that? However, I have a question to Mr Husain. He portrayed only Hindu Gods/ Goddess in nude. Why he did not do the same with say Mohammad Saheb? He would never had got citizenship from any of the Muslim countries. On the other hand he would have had fatwa issued against him. I think his decision is purely personal to enjoy tax free living and nothing to do with Indian/ Hindu fanatics. Answered by Madan Mohan , Senior Vice President - Utility Management Systems at Chemtrols Industries Limited | 04, Mar 2010 10:50 AM

• In my opinion there is nothing that we should be ashmed of. The artist in the name of creativity and imagination has no right to hurt the sentiments of any individual or any section of the community or religion. Can he expose his creativity in the same lines in his new country ?....Let him kill the arrogance in him and start respecting the sentiments of others too.. Answered by ashok darmalingam , Sr Accounts Officer at Indian Hotels Company(Taj Hotels) | 04, Mar 2010 10:48 AM

• No We Should Not be ashmed. This means Hussain is betraying his Mother Nation India, which has nurtured hiim till date. His decision to take Qatar Citizenship shows that he is More Concerned About himself than the Mother India. In Nutshell rather Hussain should be ashmed on his Decision Answered by RANJEET SINGH , ASSISTANT MANAGER at JK Tyre | 04, Mar 2010 10:22 AM

• Many Indians going US / Australia/......(so many of known personality) adopted foreign nationality. Beside this many times we appreciate foreign nationals (but Indian origin) and become happy or/and feel credit of being them as Indian. So it doesn't matter the same here also. Hurting of person / any personality on religious / minority grounds shall of course not be acceptable. Answered by Sanjay Kapoor , Sr. Manager (Mechanical Maintenance) at National Fertilizers Limited | 04, Mar 2010 10:19 AM

• To accept citizenship of other country is his own decision and he should not blame our country. He is supposed to think why he was forced to leave the country. The crime he committed must beg apology to the nation but he is taking plea of as great artist. Think the same mistake if committed against Islam or any other relegion what could be the fate. The burning example is Taslima and Saleman Rusid.Since he is Indian and by and large we used to be liberal he delibrately took this advantage and now giving blame to right wing people of India and the Govt. Since he is not accepting his mistake instead of making an appeal he must be punished openly for hurting hundu feelings. Answered by Ashok Sahoo , Senior Manager(Public Relations) at Paradeep Phosphates Limited | 04, Mar 2010 10:14 AM

• I am a citizen of India. By birth I am a Hindu. I am educated and also a law graduate. I have lot of respect for Mr. M.F. Hussain. I have faith in all religions as they are grown from same earth at different era.
  Our country had got freedom in 1947 after a lot of freedom struggle from the British and if we look back into history, we will find that British had policy of divided and rule our country.
  After the independence of our country, there constitution of India was made and it though declared india a Soverign, socialist, democratic, republic and to give all its citizens the fundamental rights of equality, justice and freedom. But a party to rule this country and to stay in the power and supremacy, have passed several ...See More enactments etc. Minorities Act, fundamentally violating the principles of equality and social justice.
  The party has made reservations for division among the castes among the people to rule the country by way of % of reservation in the jobs. When the constitution says equality of opportunity is the fundamental right of each person, what action has been taken who made several changes in last so many years and igoring the large population? The party which banned the book written by Nathuram Godse who wrote about the assissnation of Mahatma Gandhi named as “ 55 kotinche bali” i.e. the sacrifice of 55 crore people, and the party which banned the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, RSS etc. is not violation of fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression?
  When there is violation of fundamental right, there will be reflection by the other parties who want to have equality and justice. The supression mass level fundamental right, has lead to reaction to personalities like M.F. Hussain, is the victim of this state policies.
  The state of India can’t ensure the protection to eminent personalities like M.F. Hussain, and neither it could establish machinery for the enactment of constitution in short span of time. No wonder that personality like M.F. Hussain lived in exhile like Salman Rushdie and accepted the citizenship of Qatar.
  It is shame to the Indian parties who instead to bridge the gap between the communities, have kept the gap between them and this gap is widening due to lack of education.
  Regards,
  Seema Pagey Answered by seema Pagey , Advocate at Self Employed | 04, Mar 2010 10:13 AM

Comments (1)

• Well said... However, do you think Husain's saheb would, even in his wildest of imagination, dare to portray the faith and reverance a muslim country in a manner he did for a hindu faith? Also, why hide behind a shield after committing that he follied into portraying a hindu godess in a way the hindu would rarely enjoy? I agree... this involves hypocracy to some extent however we also cannot ignore that this is mostly a politically activated issue than a pure faith based one. . Commented by Sai Lithesh Kokkain, Senior Manager at Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited | 707 days ago

• If somebody giev me full day power to do any thing then I kill this type of bustered fellow, Answered by Chiranjib Roy Chowdhury , Asst Manager Warehouse & Logistics A/cs at HCL Infosystems Ltd | 04, Mar 2010 09:25 AM

• 
  There is no doubt that India lost a great treasure and its a insult to us that we have voted to such politicians,
  If such situations will continue for more time most of good people will leave India,
  ...See More
  Why most of renowned people eg Dr. Ranawat, Dr. Khurana, Kalapna Chawala, Dr. Subramanium and so on ,..list is long left India because we are complete biased by religion, cast, party and so on.......we have reservation, minorty majority, hindu muslim north south.... and no good human can tolerate , it may be mother land or father land a person should be happy
  
  If we are realy sincere towards our country then that is the right time to act and hang the all responsible for this situation other wise it will be too late.
  
  Change from yourself.
  
  Regards Answered by Balbir Singh Shekhawat , Product Manager - Field Crops at Mahyco | 04, Mar 2010 09:20 AM

Comments (1)

• well not all left due to these reasons completely.... However yes you have hit the nail!. Commented by Sai Lithesh Kokkain, Senior Manager at Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited | 707 days ago

• Thanks people...I got the answer...As Mr. Parthasarathy has rightly said, "No doubt, there is a loss to India as a nation. But India or Indians should not attach shame to the event." Certainly, no individual is above the nation and everyone is equal before the law. But is this episode a sheer example of how vulnerable an artist/public figure is in this country? Does "right to express" mean nothing to the political activists here? Answered by Bharti Mittal , HR Manager at Wipro BPO | 04, Mar 2010 09:09 AM

• Madam,
  We have discarded our own for silliest reason, he like any Indian has all the power to exhibit his individuality and likings and no individual or group can run their show India is not a banana republic. I am ashamed because we have pushed out our own from our country but there was someone to receive him elsewhere. This could happen to anyone of us Law abiding Citizens (with no muscle power). Regards george joseph Answered by george joseph , Manager Corporate Relations (Placements) at SCMS Group of Institutions | 04, Mar 2010 09:09 AM

• We should not. If he thinks he was right in his painting, why he is afraid? Answered by Kavit Pandya , GM Projects at United Phosphorus Limited | 04, Mar 2010 08:39 AM

• MF Husain is a disgrace to India.
  
  
  Even Barark Obama being a better American citizen is fighting for USA better asking Americans to study and meet the challenges of emerging Red China// India/ Germany!!!
  
  
  Why waste time over Husain Shaheb who finds refuge in middle east better than making amends for his VIOLATION FOR ARTISTIC FREEDOM OF ACTION INFRINGING 5000 YEARS OLD SENSIBILITY AND SENSITIVITY OF FELLOW INDIANS especially when he was allowed to practice the religion of his birth freely i India as a SANATHAN DHARMA and CO EXISTED !!
  
  
  Amen.
  
  Any further discussion of Husains Sahebs' failing, or character flaw may be counter productive to our wisdom !!! Answered by Narasimhan Brig Retd S L | 04, Mar 2010 06:27 AM

Comments (1)

• I can give you no. of paintings wherein Mr.Hussain has disgraced the Hindu Lady. So why should we waste time in discussing about his new nationality as he is not secular!
  . Commented by Aranya Mazumdar, Regional Projects Incharge at Pidilite Industries Limited | 707 days ago

• I think Hussain was not respecting the freedom provided to him by the great constitution of our country. Being an artist getting the freedom of expression is definitely something but not everything. Though I have personally assisted a curator in organizing a successful Art show in Mumbai but Hussein seems to be vulgar, low class and publicity seeker in few of his work. Now the problem is if you are too good at something even the miner fault shows up in a big way. So I am not with him at all. Answered by Deepak Sharma , Joint Managing Director at Essential Healthcare Ltd. | 04, Mar 2010 12:50 AM

• we need not be ashamed..Is Qatar a democratic and secular country.He shoud have painted at least one painting on Muslim religion, then gone and stayed in Qater
  le Answered by Harbans Kapur , VICE PRESIDENT at Kent RO Systems Ltd. | 04, Mar 2010 12:11 AM

• MF Hussain has every right to defend himself in the legal cases against him, ask for security cover and ask for even support from art lovers and freedom loving intelligentsia of India. It is a highly blurred view to say India rejected him. Which India is he talking about? An artist is a human being first (caring for others' sensibilities) and a citizen next (responsible and equal before law of the nation). If an artist insists he will care to be the least of these for the sake of freedom of art, I wonder, whether that art matters to a society. I do empathize with him, an artist pursuing life and art at the age of 95. I would have adored him had he defended himself. I do not want to pre judge whether he is guilty or otherwise, ...See More with his art work which is alleged to be offensive: I hope courts do that. He has not shown courage to stand up for his rights as an Indian and an artist. He has gone for the easier option of settling in Qatar. India is a land of a million MF Hussains. No doubt, there is a loss to India as a nation. But India or Indians should not attach shame to the event. MF Hussain has failed as a citizen of India - he may have won as a global artist but he was an Indian before blossoming into an artist. Even now, if he travels to India as a Qatari citizen to fight the legal battle, there will be a sense of value seen in him. Answered by GOPALAN PARTHASARATHY , Vice President & Head - Risk, KSA at BankMuscat | 03, Mar 2010 11:23 PM

Comments (1)

• Loved your analysis of the situation. . Commented by Amit Gupta, Product Head at Times Business Solutions Limited ( TBSL ) | 707 days ago

• NO BHARTI JI THERE IS NOTHING TO BE ASHAMED OF .WE COULD PROUDLY SAY WE ARE HINDUS ,WE COULD MORE LOUDLY SHOUT :WE ARE SECULAR AND FURTHER TAKE PRIDE:WE ARE THE LARGEST DEMOCRACY Answered by chandra pathak , secretary at upmsra | 03, Mar 2010 11:20 PM

• I met Mr.MF Hussain in a local Cinema Hall in Doha Qatar .I was there with my Friend to see Movie "Billu Barber". He was accompnied with a Family. It was during interval only that he was noticed by some persons who approached him for autographs and photographs.He was not replying to any querries.
  The gloomy face and strature describes his mental condition.
  In my view,Mr MF Hussain always want to be in news for his controversial paintings and statements.India as a true democratic country gives freedom to every citizen ,which is not available in all countries.We should not be ashamed for his exit because he is responsible for the events. Answered by Divakar Jha , Senior Project Manager at United Contracting for Electrical,Mechanical and Airconditioning W.L..L | 03, Mar 2010 10:37 PM

• Art does not follow barriers of land, he is a artiest. Answered by Jitendra Gupta , Deputy Manager at Chambal Fertilisers And Chemicals Limited | 03, Mar 2010 10:37 PM

• I've had the good fortune of interviewing Husain quite a few times, and the most memorable piece was a 7-page interview with him which appeared on the cover of Sunday Mail. This was when he had started painting for his autobiography. He's always been eccentric and never answered such dicey questions because he's also pretty gimmicky. Let's not get into this fundamentalists vs the secularists debate, because at the end of the day, as someone said, Ethics n Aesthetics is the same thing. How can anything be aesthetically pleasing if it offends certain sensibilities? To be very hip and say, so what, then let this logic also prevail otherwise, if Husain would have the guts to use his artistic license for the Christian n Muslim ...See More deities. And of all the places, in Qatar, how much freedom would he get to exercise? I have seen the original prints of those offensive paintings. They are truly n deliberately offensive -- you don't mock or cock a snook at the faith of other compatriots. And then to turn it into an issue of Muslim identity, noting could be more dishonest or hypocritical than this stance -- for the old ditty knows jolly well why did all this in the first place. Answered by Jyoti Sabharwal , Editorial Director & Publisher at Stellar Publishers Private Limited | 03, Mar 2010 10:31 PM

Comments (1)

• Someone who has known the issue with a closer distance automatically tends to have an authority about it. I would like to go with your version. You are right - no one gets an authority in the name of art to hurt the sensibilities of people. This violates the basic right of freedom which our constitution gives. . Commented by Amit Gupta, Product Head at Times Business Solutions Limited ( TBSL ) | 707 days ago

• No. There is no reason to be ashamed. My reasons for the same are as follows.
  1. Artistic freedom of expression has never been unfettered any time or any place in history. If blasphemous writing is/can be banned, why not blasphemous painting. Artistic freedom always have to follow the boundaries of culture, religion,law, and sensivities of the land.
  2. Persecution can be perpetrated by state or its passivity. Hussein was never persecuted by the state. A section of people were against his method of expression and he had all the recourse as per the law of the land available to any other citizen of the country facing opposition to his views or methods. Even Muslim artist has no divine right to abuse the sensibilities of other ...See More faiths.
  3. If Hussein was facing persecution he could have applied for the citizen ship of N number of liberal democratic country around the world who would have admitted him based on the merits, if any of his case. he did not have to manipulate a citizen ship offer from a autocratic muslim sheikhdom where the vast majority does not enjoy any freedom of expression anyway.
  4. last but not the least if Hussein has used the excuse of persecution to abandon his country of birth and sought habitation elsewhere, and his case is vastly different than the vast number who seek emigration in search of better quality of economic life- we as Indians also boycott his art and let him prove his worth to outside world bereft of his ' home' support.
  
  Vinod Singh Answered by Vinod Singh , Sr VP/ED at GHCL Limited | 03, Mar 2010 10:02 PM

• "Picasso of India" will remain in the books of history. He will never be called "Picasso of Qatar." Rest is his personal decision and he will remain as a artist of the world and keep contributing through his art.. Answered by Dr Nayan Mali , Vice President-Business Development and Operations at Contech BPO Services Private Limited | 03, Mar 2010 09:46 PM

• no, good riddance Answered by Jeyathilak Paul , Construction Manager at Medgulf Construction | 03, Mar 2010 09:44 PM

• Not at all we be ashamed. He was not fit for our culture, we were not of his. At the end , well- come exile. Answered by jyotikumar vaishnav , reporter at Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd | 03, Mar 2010 09:31 PM

Comments (1)

• Its good for india, if they not leave the india then all big celebrity get some rights for anything say for india,indians, culture or country.So we cant accept.
  its lesson for every celebrity. . Commented by Vinay Kumar Ojha, Production Engineer at Owens Corning India Limited | 708 days ago

• Since last 12 Years Mr. Husain was not in India, I don,t think he was planning to come back either. Hence it does not matter whether he accept Nationality of Qatar or Not, he was not Indian. And second thing Art does not follow barriers of land, so he should not be complaining for it. Answered by Rajesh Mishra , Site Chief accountant at American International Contractors Inc. (Special Project) | 03, Mar 2010 09:30 PM

• I am afraid we Indians have to blame ourselves for Husain's decision. If he had been a run-of-the-mill artist, we could have ignored it. But though nobody can accuse India of having exiled him, his action has dented our country's image as one of the most tolerant countries in the world. The fact remains that the threshold of tolerance has never been lower in our country.And that is a pity. Answered by mohammad vazeeruddin , freelance content writer/editor at self-employed professional | 03, Mar 2010 09:28 PM

Comments (3)

• How do you define tolerance? Is it that one should not react even If his wife, mother, daughter and sister are insulted and even If one’s sentiments and beliefs are played with? . Commented by Srinagesh Tanikella, Manager Finance at TNS India Pvt. Ltd. | 707 days ago
• I had the same opinion as you. However after seeing the answer of Jyoti Sabarwal and by reading some of the other answers here - I am tending to change my opinion. It is not right for any artist to hurt the deep religious sentiments of the people. Also since the court case is pending, Indian govt. should have given proper security to him to prosecute him. He need not have lived in exile because some group of people wanted him out.
  
  But still this does not justify whatever he had done earlier. It is not loss for India- it is his loss. He should have come to India, fought his case. What is he gaining by having so much love for his life at age of 95. Now was the time to fight for the right. . Commented by Amit Gupta, Product Head at Times Business Solutions Limited ( TBSL ) | 707 days ago
• tolerance will be alright if he does not make art of others religion
  let him paint nude pictures of him and his friends and not hurt other's religion
  . Commented by Jeyathilak Paul, Construction Manager at Medgulf Construction | 708 days ago

• Is MF Hussein courageous to paint posters on the subjects like Oral Talaqs, Opposition to Family Planning, multiple Nikahs in the Muslim community. Definitely not. If he had done this there might had been a FATAVA to kill MF Hussein and he would have absconded like Taslima Nasrin. Hence in my opinion if he is quitting India we should not be ashamed. Answered by Vijay Bhatewara , Assistant Manager at Syndicate Bank | 03, Mar 2010 09:26 PM

Comments (2)

• Quit logical and practical too. Commented by SHAMBHU CHARAN RAY, Area Development Executive at ICI India Ltd | 708 days ago
• Quit logical and practical too. Commented by SHAMBHU CHARAN RAY, Area Development Executive at ICI India Ltd | 708 days ago

• Tolerance level in the largest democracy of the world is presently at the lowest. This is the root cause of all ugly manifestations that have been coming up regularly nowadays. We should basically be ashamed of this. Answered by Chinmay Chakravarty , Deputy Director (News), Doordarshan, Mumbai. at Ministry of Information and Broadcasting(India) | 03, Mar 2010 09:21 PM

Comments (1)

• According to me India has not lost anything.We have pleanty of good artist as well good human beings.Its just that he wants attentins & want to be in news.Its just a political game.. Commented by bandana mushunuri | 707 days ago