COSMICUPLINK

Red tooth and claw

Posted on September 30, 2010 | Author: Vithal C Nadkarni | View 217 | Comment : 1

Kurt Vonnegut was a prisoner of war in an underground slaughterhouse during World War II. Later, he wrote a fable to make sense of his own memories of the strategically unnecessary Allied air raid on Dresden that killed 135,000 people.
    
The narrator of the fantasy, like Vonnegut, has lived through the raid as a prisoner in a subterranean abattoir. Like Vonnegut, he too has spent more than two decades trying to chart the limits of metaphoric understanding in a book.
    
For all that, Vonnegut’s novel is cri de coeur against the horrors of war. As a reviewer in Time wrote, “Few modern writers have borne witness against inhumanity with more humanity or humour as Vonnegut has.

Indeed, he sometimes sounds eerily like the 16th century mystic Sebastian Franck.Appalled by the cruelties men worked upon one another in the name of religion during the Reformation, Franck wrote: ‘whoever looks at mankind seriously may break his heart with weeping.’

Then he added: ‘We are all laughingstocks, fables and carnival farces before God.’” Vonnegut’s atheistic philosophy is equally caustic: He suggests, for instance, that the story of the Crucifixion might have been more appealing had Jesus not been the son of God but a faceless nobody!

In this regard, Indian tradition seems as pragmatic: Manu justifies the general philosophy of violence and carnivorousness as follows:
    
“The Lord of Creatures fashioned all this universe to feed the breath of life, and everything moving and stationary is the food for the breath of life. Those that do not move are food for those that move, and those that have no fangs are the food for those with fangs; those that have no hands are food for those with hands; and cowards are the food of the brave...”
    
Manu also transforms five of the earlier animal sacrifices into vegetarian ones to avoid violence!

The lawgi ver goes on to argue that these five sacrifices themselves are expiations for the inadvertent slaughter of small creatures committed by normal householders.
    
The five slaughterhouses of the householder are the fireplace, the grindstone, the broom, the mortar and pestle and the water jar.

That might explain why the Dharmaranya Purana says, “How is food to be got without violence? Is there anyone on earth without tendency towards violence?” It even talks about the ‘violence’ of thinking badly about others! Can Vonnegut beat that record?

Post Comment

Comment

Comments (1)

  • /**“How is food to be got without violence? Is there anyone on earth without tendency towards violence?”**/ All vegetarian food is devoid of violence. Because plants have no brains and can't feel the pain and can't know they are being killed. Unlike animals. No suffering or resistence is involved in vegetarainism. ' Violence' means violation of what is. That does not happen in Vegan food, Lacto Vegerarain food and Lacto vegetarian food with Eggs ( but not chicken biriyani). Thinking badly about others and abusing others may be violence . But you can always apologize and make up and undo the mental damage. But if you take life, you bring it back, however much u apologize. Verbal violence is pardonable : but killing another animal for food is NOT.

    Posted by useless fellow | 01 Oct, 2010

User Picture HRD in banks is more than just pay Overemphasising pay is an affliction of the private sector. In this respect, as well, a public secto.. T T Ram Mohan Read full story

User Picture Paradigm shift to combat disaster We need to move away from international rescue post-disaster to local action to prevent/mitigate dis.. Bhola R Gurjar Read full story

Sway: Irresistible pull of irrational behaviour

Rom Brafman

A growing body of research reveals that our behaviour and decision-making are influenced by an array..

Read full story

The Economy Times

About Us | Terms & Conditions | Contact Us

Copyright © PeerPower.com 2010. All rights reserved.

powered by PeerPower