Avoid mindless ban on technology

Posted on August 3, 2010 | Author: Kiran Karnik | View 1012 | Comment : 3

The morbid threat of terrorism has paranoid governments banning several ‘dual-use’ technologies and treading on citizens’ rights under the pretext of protecting them.

artical Picture

Despite the growing tendency to see the world as black or white — the with-me-oragainst-me syndrome, echoed by an important Indian cal leader too — most people do recognise the many sides to an issue: not just shades of grey but, indeed, a spectrum of colours. One area where this has long been manifest is technology. Whether the technology is good or bad, evil or a godsend, depends on context, perspective and use. A knife can kill, and the surgeon’s knife can save a life. Ultimately, it is not the technology or the weapon that takes lives, but the finger that pulls the trigger, the mind that conceives the crime; as the Unesco Charter states, ‘wars begin in the minds of men’. 
It may be well to remember this as the country — and the world — faces new challenges. For the first time in the history of the modern nation-state, it is seriously threatened not by another nation-state but by small organised groups. Thanks to technology, a band of highlymotivated individuals can hold a powerful nation to ransom or cause mayhem on an unprecedented scale. The world saw this — literally, thanks to real-time TV coverage — on September 11, 2001, in the US and, in a different way, on November 26, 2008, in Mumbai. In the latter case, destruction entailed the use of standard weapons: guns and explosives. In the former instance, the weapon was a civilian aircraft. 
Explosives have long been used to clear obstacles while building roads or for other construction-related purposes. As such, the technology itself can hardly be faulted for how it is used. The argument in the case of civil aircraft is even more obvious. Around the world, means of transport — trucks, cars, motorcycles and, in India, even bicycles — have been used as carriers of explosives, to create chaos and cause destruction. 
No sane person has yet suggested a ban on aeroplanes, motorcycles, cars or bicycles, but, in a shoot-the-messenger reaction, mobile phones were long banned in parts of the country. There is also a general ban on the use of satellite phones across the country. Of course, it is well known that mobile phones are sometimes used to trigger an explosion, and that people — including terrorists — talk to each other by satellite phones. 
Do we, then, consider mobile telephony a dangerous dual-use technology and impose curbs on its use? The Commonwealth Games in Delhi are likely to face security threats — should all mobile phone connections be cut off in the city during those two weeks? 
In the telecom sphere itself, there is now much controversy regarding email services like Blackberry and about telecom equipment itself. There are proposals to impose conditions regarding imported equipment and software that are so onerous that few manufacturers will agree to them — unless they intend to flout them through some clever subterfuge. 
The aim, apparently, was to keep out Chinese equipment — without an explicit ban — for reasons of security (possibly instigated by rival equipment suppliers from other countries who are now, doubtless, ruing being hoist with their own petard!). Ironically, the only ones who may willingly agree to all the conditions are the Chinese vendors. 
Meanwhile, there are technologies that track eye movement and other body parameters; with these inputs and appropriate software, psychologists are able to detect nervousness. It is proposed to use this to identify potential terrorists by putting cameras and sensors at the back of every aircraft seat to monitor each passenger. 
New technologies will soon monitor thought through electroencephalograms or other means. It will not be long before we have, as in science-fiction films, mind cops who arrest people before they commit a crime. Of course, these systems will not be perfect, but — it will be argued — it is better to have 10 innocents in jail than one criminal free to cause mayhem. 
It was probably on similar considerations that, according to media reports, one country wanted to ban the export of pencils to Iraq some years ago. Pencils contain graphite that happens to be the material used as moderator in nuclear reactors. A case of dual-use materials, or an instance of fearing that — quite literally — the pen (pencil) may be mightier than the sword! 
In a world of growing terrorism, many of the concerns are understandable. Quite rightly, few want to take chances, and officials least of all. Any possible security hazard — even a farfetched one — results in some kind of ban, and its revocation is a slow process. A case in point is the ban on metal cutlery on flights, imposed in the US at the height of its security paranoia. Most countries dutifully followed suit, and it was months before silverware finally reappeared. Of course, metal cutlery is more prone to dual use than pencils. 
The line between the state’s responsibility for public safety and the individual’s right to privacy is not only getting fuzzy, but is being redrawn. The list of technologies that are sought to be regulated and controlled — for public safety — is growing. Few would argue against controls on guns — even in the US, the ‘gun lobby’ is slowly losing dominance — but should the concept of dangerous ‘weapons’ extend to mobile telephones? Can technologies be controlled? Is it all right for government to tap into any telephone conversation and monitor all internet traffic? Will laws permitting preventive detention be revived to arrest people on the basis of psychological indicators that could be construed as pointing towards criminal intent? 
The combination of an adverse security environment and new technologies throw up these and a host of difficult questions. There is too little discussion on these, and it seems that decisions are being driven by a few forceful individuals who see the issue as black and white. It is time that responsible corporate bodies and civil society organisations initiated an informed discussion on this. Our security is, doubtless, at stake — but so is our way of life, our freedom. 

Post Comment


Comments (3)

  • Can technology be controlled?
    My views for the above question: - Yes it can be controlled by awareness not fully but up to maximum extent. Like at the touching stage of young every individual gets thrilling of nature by witnessing the changes within its own body and get attracted to opposite sex which is natural phenomena in the process of nature but our society having its own boundary and have instructed it for regulation through many means starting from home institution to VEDA,KORAN & BIBEL and all of them say in the similar voice. One control himself up to a certain age or stage where he/she gets married
    Through this the entire society is being regulated morally first.
    ...See More

    Posted by Bidyadhar Nayak | 04 Aug, 2010

  • technology is a part of nature/energy,thus,it can neither be stopped nor be curtailed.
    we must grow with it and expand to help all.

    Posted by sisir patr , Circle Head at Telecom | 03 Aug, 2010

  • Well made answer to technology use is its free sale. When people started inventing and discovering, the first ever machine given to the human world was a clock, after this humans kept running round and round, keeping seasons to all the year constant and same which is a god's creation and is nature. But this was ignored. The one of the reason to world war II was the new creations of weapons which the country wanted to try on for power, after which it was taken to government control. The same thing happened with every luxuries of life for which patent to the factories were given and sold to the masses, government keeping an eye. Well yes, people like to use easy going things, that also goes with medicine, but the study which interest people more shall be easy. Technology is an answer. The ...See More

    Posted by Vinit Agarwal,Publisher / Owner at MilkyDwarf, Web Magazine|03 Aug, 2010

How will you measure your life?

Clayton M Christensen

Before I published The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail, I..

Read full story

In the harmony of machines

Mukul Sharma

Here's irony indeed: earthworms, eagles and orangutans are examples of creatures that seem to be in ..

Read full story

The Economy Times

About Us | Terms & Conditions | Contact Us

Copyright © 2010. All rights reserved.

powered by PeerPower